Xavier Claessens authored 9 years ago and Sjoerd Simons committed 9 years ago

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.apertis.org/D532

Simon McVittie authored 9 years ago and Sjoerd Simons committed 9 years ago

In many tests, we run a scenario twice, once with a fake "malicious"
LD_PRELOAD and one without. Prefix the tests so we get

normal_test1: pass
normal_test2: pass
normal.expected_underlying_tests: pass
normal.expected: pass
malicious_test1: fail
malicious_test2: pass
malicious.expected_underlying_tests: fail
malicious.expected: pass

instead of having "duplicate" results for the underlying tests:

test1: pass
test2: pass
normal.expected_underlying_tests: pass
normal.expected: pass
test1: fail
test2: pass
malicious.expected_underlying_tests: fail
malicious.expected: pass

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.apertis.org/D282


Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: xclaesse