Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 903f9728 authored by Peter Senna Tschudin's avatar Peter Senna Tschudin
Browse files

Fix typos and minor issues on long-term-reproducibility.md


This commit fixes typos and small issues on the long term
reproducibility document.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@collabora.com>
parent 782f2bf4
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!100Fix typos and minor issues on long-term-reproducibility.md
Pipeline #160930 passed
......@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ has multiple active release channels to both provide a stable foundation for
product teams and also give them full visibility on the latest developments.
Each release channel has its own artefacts, the main one being the
[deployable images](https://apertis.org/images/) targeting the [reference
[deployable images](https://images.apertis.org/) targeting the [reference
hardware platforms](https://www.apertis.org/reference_hardware/), which get
built by mixing:
......@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ channels is that each channel should have its own set of inputs, so that
changes in a channel do not impact other channels.
Even within channels sometimes it is desirable to reproduce a past build
as closely as possible, for instance to deliver an hotfix to an existing
as closely as possible, for instance to deliver a hotfix to an existing
product while minimizing the chance of introducing regressions due to
unrelated changes. The Apertis goal of reliable, reproducible builds does
not only help developers in their day-to-day activities, but also gives
......@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ original as possible, ignoring any update regardless of their importance.
To accomplish that goal the package archives are snapshotted regularly,
storing their full history. The image build pipeline accepts an optional
parameters to use a specific snapshot rather than the latest contents.
parameter to use a specific snapshot rather than the latest contents.
This results in the execution installing exactly the same packages and
versions as the original run, regardless of any changes that landed in the
archive in the meantime.
......@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ latest package versions for each channel.
Since the purposes taken in account in this document do not involve large scale
package rebuilds, it is recommended to use the SDK images and the devroots in
combination with the snapshotted APT archives to rebuild packages in a
combination with the snapshotted APT archives to rebuild packages in an
environment closely matching a past build.
# Recommendations for product teams
......@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ relevant hashes that were used to create an image. The outcome of the planned
work will be the publication of text files containing all relevant hashes for
future use.
## Using the Golden components two years after release 1.0.0: Creating the new release
## Using the golden components two years after release 1.0.0: Creating the new release
We recommend product teams to make constant releases, for example in a quarterly
basis, to cover security updates and to minimize the technical debt to Apertis
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment