Signed-off-by: ABHINISH KUMAR external.abhinish.kumar@in.bosch.com
ABHINISH KUMAR (beff9afe) at 26 Mar 10:00
Updated popup-screenshot of clock and date notification bar
ABHINISH KUMAR (bc970e26) at 26 Mar 09:35
Adapt pstore test to use systemd-pstore
... and 21 more commits
Issue is reproducible on: v2025dev1 20240131.0017 Image version.
Issue is not reproducible with apt/ostree boot-up image: https://images.apertis.org/weekly/v2025dev1/20240131.0017/
Test cases are also getting passed: https://qa.apertis.org/submit_report/v2025dev1/20240131.0017/hmi-amd64-uefi-public/ostree
critical
TBD
TBD
imx6q-sabrelite-lava-cbg-6
with apertis_ostree_v2022-fixedfunction-armhf-uboot_20240124.0315.img.gz
imx6q-sabrelite-lava-cbg-6
with apertis_ostree_v2022-fixedfunction-armhf-uboot_20240124.0315.img.gz
imx6q-sabrelite-lava-cbg-6
with apertis_ostree_v2022-fixedfunction-armhf-uboot_20240124.0315.img.gz
imx6q-sabrelite-lava-cbg-6
with apertis_ostree_v2022-fixedfunction-armhf-uboot_20240124.0315.img.gz
imx6q-sabrelite-lava-cbg-6
with apertis_ostree_v2022-fixedfunction-armhf-uboot_20240124.0315.img.gz
imx6q-sabrelite-lava-cbg-6
with apertis_ostree_v2022-fixedfunction-armhf-uboot_20240124.0315.img.gz
imx6q-sabrelite-lava-cbg-6
with apertis_ostree_v2022-fixedfunction-armhf-uboot_20240124.0315.img.gz
TBD
TBD
This section is for management only, it should be the last one in the description
apertis:lava:suite: aum-rollback-blacklist
Phabricator link: https://phabricator.apertis.org/T10280
In the latest release this test case getting passed, Hence closing the issue.
In the latest releases this test case has passed successfully, hence closing the issue.
medium
TBD
TBD
qemu-hetzner-0
with apertis_v2025dev1-basesdk-amd64-sdk_20231219.0017.img.gz
TBD
TBD
This section is for management only, it should be the last one in the description
apertis:lava:suite: apparmor-ofono
Phabricator link: https://phabricator.apertis.org/T10233
critical
TBD
TBD
qemu-hetzner-8
with apertis_v2025dev1-sdk-amd64-sdk_20240119.0017.img.gz
TBD
TBD
This section is for management only, it should be the last one in the description
apertis:lava:suite: sanity-check
Phabricator link: https://phabricator.apertis.org/T10276
In the latest releases this test case has passed successfully, hence closing the issue.
critical
TBD
TBD
r8a7796-m3ulcb-cbg-0
with apertis_ostree_v2023-fixedfunction-arm64-uboot_20230624.0116.img.gz
r8a7796-m3ulcb-cbg-0
with apertis_ostree_v2023-fixedfunction-arm64-uboot_20230624.0116.img.gz
r8a7796-m3ulcb-cbg-0
with apertis_ostree_v2023-fixedfunction-arm64-uboot_20230624.0116.img.gz
r8a7796-m3ulcb-cbg-0
with apertis_ostree_v2023-fixedfunction-arm64-uboot_20230624.0116.img.gz
r8a7796-m3ulcb-cbg-0
with apertis_ostree_v2023-fixedfunction-arm64-uboot_20230624.0116.img.gz
r8a7796-m3ulcb-cbg-0
with apertis_ostree_v2023-fixedfunction-arm64-uboot_20230624.0116.img.gz
r8a7796-m3ulcb-cbg-0
with apertis_ostree_v2023-fixedfunction-arm64-uboot_20230624.0116.img.gz
TBD
TBD
This section is for management only, it should be the last one in the description
apertis:lava:suite: aum-out-of-space
Phabricator link: https://phabricator.apertis.org/T9860
In the latest releases this test case has passed successfully, hence closing the issue.
Issue is getting reproduced on 2022 & 2023 also, Updated the description section.
https://images.apertis.org/weekly/v2022/20231025.0215/ https://images.apertis.org/weekly/v2023/20231025.0116/
v2024pre 20231025.0016
Deployment | Type | v2022 | v2023 | v2024dev3 | v2024pre |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ostree | fixedfunction | 20231025.0215 | 20231025.0116 20231101.0115 | 20231025.0016 |
https://qa.apertis.org/testcases/v2022/apertis-update-manager-ota-rollback.html
https://qa.apertis.org/testcases/v2023/apertis-update-manager-ota-rollback.html
Run the above-mentioned test case, after executing step no. 16 issue is getting reproduced.
Test case should pass with expected result.
Test case is not getting passed with expected result.
1.
Low/Medium
TBD
TBD
This section is for management only, it should be the last one in the description.
/cc @andrunko @em @Balasubramanian @sudarshan @wlozano
Phabricator link: https://phabricator.apertis.org/T10178
Hi @wlozano,
I have re-tested it, and yes it was a transient issue it works fine after reinstalling SDK.
https://images.apertis.org/weekly/v2022/20231025.0215/
Deployment | Type | v2022 | v2023 | v2024dev3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
apt | sdk | 20231025.0215 |
Run the above mentioned test case. After executing step no.2 in executions step issue is getting reproduce.
Totem application should get installed.
Totem application is unable get install.
High
TBD
TBD
This section is for management only, it should be the last one in the description.
/cc @andrunko @em @Balasubramanian @sudarshan @wlozano
Phabricator link: https://phabricator.apertis.org/T10173
apertis_v2024dev2-hmi-amd64-uefi_v2024dev2.0.img.gz
apertis_v2022-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230705.0115.img.gz
apertis_v2023-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230712.0315.img.gz
apertis_v2023-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230717.0316.img.gz
apertis_v2022-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230719.0115.img.gz
apertis_v2023-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230726.0315.img.gz
apertis_v2024dev3-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230801.0016.img.gz
apertis_v2022-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230808.0116.img.gz
apertis_v2023-hmi-amd64-uefi_20230810.0315.img.gz
apertis_v2022-hmi-amd64-uefi_v2022.6rc1.img.gz
Deployment | Type | v2022 | v2023 | v2024dev1 | v2024dev2 | v2024dev3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
apt | target/hmi | 20230705.0115 20230719.0115 20230808.0116 20230809.0115 20230816.0116 | 20230712.0315 20230717.0316 20230726.0315 20230810.0315 20230809.0316 20230719.0315 | 20230621.1604 | 20230801.0016 20230802.0015 | |
ostree | target/hmi | 20230705.0115 20230719.0115 20230808.0116 20230809.0115 20230816.0116 | 20230712.0315 20230717.0316 20230726.0315 20230810.0315 20230809.0316 20230719.0315 | 20230621.1604 | 20230801.0016 20230802.0015 |
https://qa.apertis.org/testcases/v2024dev2/sanity-check-manual.html https://qa.apertis.org/testcases/v2022/sanity-check-manual.html https://qa.apertis.org/testcases/v2024dev3/sanity-check-manual.html
Run above mentioned test case, after executing step no.4
Sanity-check test case should pass.
Test case is failing.
critical
TBD
This section is for management only, it should be the last one in the description.
/cc @andrunko @em @sudarshan @wlozano
Phabricator link: https://phabricator.apertis.org/T9913
Hence closing the issue, it's not reproducible now.
Hi @daissi,
Changes has been done, which you have mentioned above on top of it I had formatted the USB stick, reissued the command (pinged above), now it's working fine.
PFA regarding storage blocks