- Jun 15, 2020
-
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
- pw_core_info has data that represent the remote core - pw_core properties are the properties of its pw_client, initially inherited from the pw_context, which can be updated either when calling pw_context_connect() or later at runtime (the pw_core calls pw_client_update_properties() on its pw_client) wp_core_update_properties() is made in such a way so that we can do: ``` clone = wp_core_clone(core); wp_core_update_properties(clone, ...); wp_core_connect(clone); ``` and get clone to have different properties than the original core, while they still share the same pw_context underneath
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
also delay the "connected" signal until info is there
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
a method to take the internal pw_properties without copying
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
and do not allow writing to wrapped pw_properties, since they are const now
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-
Martin Koch, ESE GmbH authored
- due to usage of Reference-counted-data in lib/wptoml/array.cpp (requires >= 2.58, see https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Reference-counted-data.html) - and usage of G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH in lib/wp/object-interest.c (requires 2.60, see https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Miscellaneous-Macros.html#G-GNUC-FALLTHROUGH:CAPS ) Signed-off-by:
Martin Koch, ESE GmbH <martin.koch@ese.de>
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
the spa object undereath doesn't do that and we lose a bunch of properties otherwise
-
- Jun 12, 2020
-
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
- Jun 11, 2020
-
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-
- Jun 10, 2020
-
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
By mistake, WpImplNode was developed by keeping in mind that the proxy returned by pw_core_export() is a PW_TYPE_INTERFACE_Node, but this is not true. It's actually a ClientNode... Unfortunately, making WpImplNode work as if it was a WpNode is not so easy, especially when it comes to handling params, which need to be queried syncrhonously on the underlying spa_node. So, instead of fixing WpImplNode to work as a WpNode, we choose to disconnect them. This way, WpImplNode will not be used as a proxy in the registry and the registry will normally create WpNode proxies instead, making round-trips through the server to change node params.
-
- Jun 08, 2020
-
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
- Jun 07, 2020
-
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
reserve-device: don't increment jack_n_acquired if it is 0 and use the updated value when setting data
-
- Jun 05, 2020
-
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
- Jun 04, 2020
-
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
Julian Bouzas authored
-
- Jun 03, 2020
-
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
if jack is running, that probably means that we want the jack endpoints to be the default playback/capture path
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
This is necessary to finish augmenting nodes that advertise PropInfo & Props in their param info but they don't actually have any properties, so there is no param event emitted (ex. the jack device nodes) Because the sync is synchronous with the calls over the protocol, the callback is ensured to be called after all the param events have been emitted
-
George Kiagiadakis authored
-