Commit b28f1b3b authored by Emanuele Aina's avatar Emanuele Aina

security: Misc typo fixes

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Aina's avatarEmanuele Aina <emanuele.aina@collabora.com>

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.apertis.org/D3964
parent 5508365e
......@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ work-around the path-based restrictions that should not mean privilege
escalation, given the white-list approach that is being adopted. That
approach means that any binary escaping its containment profile would in
actuality be dropping privileges, not escalating them, since the
restrictions imposed on binaries that do not have their own profilecan
restrictions imposed on binaries that do not have their own profile can
be quite extensive.
Note, too, that Collabora is proposing mounting partitions that should
......@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ and effective way of implementing this requirement.
Since all those Linux Security Modules rely on the same kernel API and
have the same overall goals, the features and resources they are able to
protect frameworks are very similar, thus not much time will be spent
protect are very similar, thus not much time will be spent
covering those. The policy format and how control over the system and
its components is exerted varies from framework to framework, though,
which leads to different limitations. The table below has a summary of
......@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ features, simplicity and limitations:
> Comparison of LSM features
Historically LSM modules have focused on kernel-mediated accesses, such
as access to file system objects and network resources. Modern system,
as access to file system objects and network resources. Modern systems,
though, have several important features being managed by user-space
daemons. D-Bus is one such daemon and is specially important since it is
the IPC mechanism used by those daemons and applications for
......@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ the potential was never realized.
SELinux offers the most flexible configuration of security policies, but
it introduces a lot of complexity on the setup and maintenance of the
policies, not only for distribution maintainers but also for application
developers and packagers, which impacts on the costs of the solution It
developers and packagers, which impacts on the costs of the solution. It
is quite common to see Fedora users running into problems caused by
SELinux configuration issues.
......@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ running system.
The new version of the upgraded package and its new profile will only
take effect after the system has been rebooted. For details about how
*.deb* packages will be handled when the system is upgraded please see
the *System Updates and Rollback* document*.*
the *System Updates and Rollback* document.
For more details on how applications from the store will be handled, the
*Applications* document produced by Collabora goes into details about
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment