Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 5da2c0bb authored by Dylan Aïssi's avatar Dylan Aïssi
Browse files

Fix wording

parent a27cebaa
Branches main
1 merge request!4Add results of new evaluation with apertis v2024 and pipewire 0.3.84
Pipeline #644945 passed
......@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ colorlinks: true
A first evaluation of PipeWire 0.3.59 on R-Car was done with Apertis v2023.
Because the results present some artefacts, the same evaluation is repeated
Because the results present some artefacts, the same evaluation has been repeated
with Apertis v2024pre and [PipeWire 0.3.84](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/releases/0.3.84).
Please refer to the [first report](https://gitlab.apertis.org/daissi/pipewire-evaluation/-/blob/main/README.md)
......@@ -131,10 +131,7 @@ stream redirected to 1 output) to evaluate how the sound is affected.
Like for the previous evaluation , it's not possible to reconfigure a running
device. That means, to reconfigure the sample rate input, we have to force the
device input to be idle. **NOTE:** there was a bug in pipewire 0.3.79 where nodes
don't switch to idle status when they are no longer in use preventing the
reconfiguration of the capture rate. Consequently, a new version (0.3.84) of
pipewire was imported in Apertis v2024.
device input to be idle.
During the test, two wav files are generated `test-case-capture1.wav` and
`test-case-capture2.wav` (both are available in `results_v2024/test-case-2/`).
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment