architecture: license-scanning: Fix missing references

The following commit reworked the licensing documentation, leaving
broken references, fix it.

  commit af5fd687
  Author: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
  Date:   Tue Jul 6 16:46:36 2021 +0100

      Rework licensing documentation

Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com>

content/architecture/license-scanning.md

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ save some work on those releases.
 Regular checks of the whole archive have been integrated into Apertis CI
 pipelines to provide early detection of any change to the licensing status of
 each package. A copyright report is generated and kept updated using
-[scan-copyrights]( {{< ref "#scan-copyrights" >}} ), helping
+[scan-copyrights]( {{< ref "#source-code-scanning-with-scan-copyrights" >}} ), helping
 [Apertis maintainers]({{< ref "contributions.md#the-role-of-maintainers" >}})
 to detect problematic licenses or missing information which may require a
 manual check.
@@ -80,8 +80,9 @@ will fail reporting on those problematic entries that weren't whitelisted.
 FOSSology is a license reporting tool. It is being
 [integrated into Apertis]({{< ref "automated-license-compliance.md" >}}) as a
 replacement for `scan-copyrights` as part of an effort to enable end-to-end
-tracking of licensing information. Although [scan-copyrights]( {{< ref
-"#scan-copyrights" >}} ) has helped a lot on automating the process, the
+tracking of licensing information. Although
+[scan-copyrights]( {{< ref "#source-code-scanning-with-scan-copyrights" >}} ) has helped a lot
+on automating the process, the
 approach using FOSSology will result in a finer grained and more reliable
 license identification through to the identification of the licensing
 applicable to each binary package.